Yesterday
I tuned into a Grassroots Teach-in about Citizens United via moveon.org: http://front.moveon.org/grassroots-democracy/#.UuBIPUEo5Yx
The
teach-in was held on the fourth anniversary of the Citizens United Supreme
Court decision.
Some
of the speakers included Representative Sarbanes from Maryland, Michael Brune of
the Sierra Club, Larry Cohen of the CWA (Communications Workers of America), Liz
Kennedy from demos.org, Heather McGhee of demos.org, and there was another
speaker but I cannot find his name anywhere. The conference was done in the
style of a Google + Hangout.
The
point of the hangout was to discuss the problems that the Citizens United
outcome has caused and to discuss methods to combat the decision and stabilize
the foundation of American democracy.
The
ideas were ones I have discussed in previous blog posts: dark money is allowing
the rich to determine the path of American policy by electing who they wish by
flooding their favorite candidates with money, corporations are allowed to fund
elections without full disclosure of where the money is going, paid ads funded by
the rich flood airways and influence the vote towards candidates who can afford
to buy the airtime, etc.
Ideas
as to how to fix the problems brought on by Citizens United were presented as
well. Some suggestions were as follows:
Influence SEC to
require full disclosure of corporate and non-profit funding of campaigns
Influence state
governments to fund and support public financing for campaigns
Amend the constitution
and limit aggregate total spending from individuals, corporations, and
non-profits in campaigns
Refundable tax credits
for lower-income political contributors who want to have a voice in elections
but may not be able to afford to provide support to the candidate they want to
see win
These
are all pretty great and straightforward ideas. All they require is the
dedication of citizens and activists to make them happen.
One
current event I learned about that I would like to share is the current Supreme
Court Case known as McCutcheon v FEC.
On September 28, 2012, the U.S. District Court
for the District of Columbia dismissed a lawsuit brought by plaintiffs Shaun
McCutcheon and the Republican National Committee (RNC) challenging the Federal
Election Campaign Act’s (the Act’s) biennial limit on individual contributions.
The plaintiffs contended the limit was unconstitutionally low and was not
supported by a sufficient governmental interest. http://www.fec.gov/law/litigation/McCutcheon.shtml
Essentially,
McCutcheon claims his freedom of speech is being limited because he can’t spend
more than 120,000 dollars on a candidate. Meanwhile, lower bracket citizens
crushed by a corrupt system of campaign funding can hardly afford to give 5
dollars to have their voice heard.
Enough
said: I personally don’t want McCutcheon to win this case.
According
to our friends who spoke during the teach-in, moveon.org is already planning
flash demonstrations and protests in case the decision does not weigh in the progressive
favor.
So,
what do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment