Continuing
from my last post, here are Professor Campbell’s main points about why vegan is
better than paleo. Firstly, it is important to note that Campbell is the author
of The China Study, the most comprehensive nutritional study ever
conducted. Its formulation involved twenty years of research and supplication
from other nutritional studies conducted before it. I highly recommend renting
it from the library or purchasing it for your own collection. It’s a tough
read, but it’s fantastic.
Moving
on; here are some main points from Campbell’s argument. The first thing he
asserts is, of course, that a vegan diet leads to better health. Campbell
states that ingesting animal products such as meat and dairy have been shown to
lead to steroid and growth hormone imbalances in the human body. As a matter of
fact, both Campbell and Cordain agree that consuming dairy products in
unnatural and unhealthy for humans. Thinking about it logically, the only
animals to consume dairy after infancy are humans, and other animals certainly
don’t drink the milk of other species. It’s kind of bizarre and disturbing,
when you think about it.
Another
point Campbell scores for the vegans relates to the actual method of
experimentation and research each debater subscribes to. Cordain supports the
reductionist approach, studying each nutrient individually, whereas Campbell
takes a holistic approach, studying how all of the nutrients work and react
together. Need I say more?
The
final major point Campbell makes is that the consumption of animal protein has
been positively correlated with higher rates of cancer such as breast,
prostate, kidney, colon, and ovarian cancer. It has also been correlated in the
same manner with cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, hypertension, osteoporosis,
multiple sclerosis, and kidney stones.
Next
time, I will post Cordain’s rebuttal to Campbell’s points.
Bean
out.
No comments:
Post a Comment